Margaret Lockwood, the artist who runs Woodwalk Gallery in Egg Harbor with her husband, Allin Walker, credits him with the idea of pairing her paintings with photography by Rolf Olson. But she suggested they use only his black and white images. One day last year he brought files to her studio and they picked out images to go with paintings.
They didn’t look for the same subject matter, although in one pairing both canvas and print depict trees, but more for similar atmosphere or evoked feelings.
Lockwood thinks the photographs can help some viewers with her paintings.
“Some people who might not understand the painting because they are abstract but when they see the photos and the words — they enhance each other.”
She asked Olson, a poet, to add some of his writing to the display.
“I was not going to write a poem for each and every picture, but I said I would write some thoughts about the combination of paintings and photographs, They aren’t full-blown poems but more word thoughts.”
They have published the collaboration in a small book entitled “suggestions of a correspondence.” On a spread that shows a green-cast painting of trees opposite a black and white photograph in a misty forest during the winter, Olson wrote: “The trunks/ Defy gravity/ Bearing the weight of the sky.”
Some of the pairings show equal abstraction in painting and photo. A painting of a streaked red and gray sky above what could be a tiny band of horizon at the bottom faces a photo of what might be shadows a fence has cast on snow. Whatever the origins of the images, seeing them together invites a viewer to linger, study both, look for origins and then simply settle back and enjoy the work, casting an eye back and forth for similarities and differences, the elements of composition, the delight in color, the pleasure in shades of gray.
A painting looks like water, especially when seen with a photograph of floating circle of ice off Cave Point. “Water bears/The likeness/Of the day,” Olson wrote and it makes sense with both images. Then again, perhaps the painting is pure abstraction. Does it matter? Does the combination make you look closer at both? It works for me.
Olson’s word thoughts are well done, probably better than poems because they spur your imagination rather than trying to define a single image, or the combination of images. With a red-banded sky over a darker band of earth (reading landscape into a painting that may nor may not be landscape) set alongside a black and white of two trees in a field with brilliant clouds, Olson has written “Light and land/Air and water/There we dwell.”
Plans are to release a related CD by midsummer’s music, but that hasn’t come out yet. Alfred Stieglitz, the great American photography pioneer, did a series of cloud pictures in the 1920 that he called “Equivalents,” and more formally he called the series Music: A Sequence of Ten Cloud Photographs.
He told his wife Georgia O’Keeffe "I wanted a series that when seen by Ernest Bloch (the great composer) he would exclaim: Music! Music! Man, why that is music! How did you ever do that? And he would point to violins and flutes, and oboes, and brass…”
Images by Margaret Lockwood and Rolf Olson at Woodwalk
So I asked Lockwood whether she listened to music while she painted, wondering if she was trying to capture music in her art.
“Yes, but I listen to NPR too.” Oh well, so much for that romantic notion unless someone with with sharper vision than I can find echoes of news broadcasts in her work.
Both of them loved the collaboration and think the combination of abstraction in painting with realism in photography worked well, although Olson’s photographs have abstract qualities, which viewers have noticed.
“I have to explain to viewers that I didn’t paint from the photographs,” Lockwood said. Her paintings were already done when she and Olson sat down to pick photos to go with them. Realistic painting with other realistic work would be more of a problem, she said.
Olson said that in making their selection of photographs to go with painting they looked for photo images that would resonate, not duplicate Lockwood’s work.
“I think it is a very interesting and revealing exhibit because the styles couldn’t be more different in terms of the real soft focus paintings she does and the black and white sharp focus.”
That’s not entirely accurate because while several of his photos are high contrast, several others are composed of grays. Images of clouds on page 26 and 27 are almost equally abstract, qualities Olson captures well in his writing: “Clouds like thoughts/Swirl and reflect/Caught in the moment.”
It’s an intriguing show. Here’s hoping it leads to more collaborations, perhaps reaching out to include sculpture and maybe a more active involvement with music.
They didn’t look for the same subject matter, although in one pairing both canvas and print depict trees, but more for similar atmosphere or evoked feelings.
Lockwood thinks the photographs can help some viewers with her paintings.
“Some people who might not understand the painting because they are abstract but when they see the photos and the words — they enhance each other.”
She asked Olson, a poet, to add some of his writing to the display.
“I was not going to write a poem for each and every picture, but I said I would write some thoughts about the combination of paintings and photographs, They aren’t full-blown poems but more word thoughts.”
They have published the collaboration in a small book entitled “suggestions of a correspondence.” On a spread that shows a green-cast painting of trees opposite a black and white photograph in a misty forest during the winter, Olson wrote: “The trunks/ Defy gravity/ Bearing the weight of the sky.”
Some of the pairings show equal abstraction in painting and photo. A painting of a streaked red and gray sky above what could be a tiny band of horizon at the bottom faces a photo of what might be shadows a fence has cast on snow. Whatever the origins of the images, seeing them together invites a viewer to linger, study both, look for origins and then simply settle back and enjoy the work, casting an eye back and forth for similarities and differences, the elements of composition, the delight in color, the pleasure in shades of gray.
A painting looks like water, especially when seen with a photograph of floating circle of ice off Cave Point. “Water bears/The likeness/Of the day,” Olson wrote and it makes sense with both images. Then again, perhaps the painting is pure abstraction. Does it matter? Does the combination make you look closer at both? It works for me.
Olson’s word thoughts are well done, probably better than poems because they spur your imagination rather than trying to define a single image, or the combination of images. With a red-banded sky over a darker band of earth (reading landscape into a painting that may nor may not be landscape) set alongside a black and white of two trees in a field with brilliant clouds, Olson has written “Light and land/Air and water/There we dwell.”
Plans are to release a related CD by midsummer’s music, but that hasn’t come out yet. Alfred Stieglitz, the great American photography pioneer, did a series of cloud pictures in the 1920 that he called “Equivalents,” and more formally he called the series Music: A Sequence of Ten Cloud Photographs.
He told his wife Georgia O’Keeffe "I wanted a series that when seen by Ernest Bloch (the great composer) he would exclaim: Music! Music! Man, why that is music! How did you ever do that? And he would point to violins and flutes, and oboes, and brass…”
Images by Margaret Lockwood and Rolf Olson at Woodwalk
So I asked Lockwood whether she listened to music while she painted, wondering if she was trying to capture music in her art.
“Yes, but I listen to NPR too.” Oh well, so much for that romantic notion unless someone with with sharper vision than I can find echoes of news broadcasts in her work.
Both of them loved the collaboration and think the combination of abstraction in painting with realism in photography worked well, although Olson’s photographs have abstract qualities, which viewers have noticed.
“I have to explain to viewers that I didn’t paint from the photographs,” Lockwood said. Her paintings were already done when she and Olson sat down to pick photos to go with them. Realistic painting with other realistic work would be more of a problem, she said.
Olson said that in making their selection of photographs to go with painting they looked for photo images that would resonate, not duplicate Lockwood’s work.
“I think it is a very interesting and revealing exhibit because the styles couldn’t be more different in terms of the real soft focus paintings she does and the black and white sharp focus.”
That’s not entirely accurate because while several of his photos are high contrast, several others are composed of grays. Images of clouds on page 26 and 27 are almost equally abstract, qualities Olson captures well in his writing: “Clouds like thoughts/Swirl and reflect/Caught in the moment.”
It’s an intriguing show. Here’s hoping it leads to more collaborations, perhaps reaching out to include sculpture and maybe a more active involvement with music.